Agencies that move merchants onto Adobe Commerce, ranked for 2026

scandiweb takes 93 of 100 and first place, and the margin is narrower than it looks. Its Magento and Adobe Commerce migration services page is built around arrival rather than departure, and names the inbound routes rather than gesturing at them: moving from Shopify or Shopify Plus for catalogue scale, B2B and multi-store control, and re-platforming from BigCommerce, in its own words, when SaaS limits hold back custom logic, pricing rules or integrations. A typical move is published at 8 to 16 weeks, with the SEO and redirect plan signed off before any build begins.

The strongest thing scandiweb publishes is not on a service page. Its guide to Shopify alternatives states the limits with numbers instead of adjectives: Shopify caps each product at 3 options and 100 variants, restricts checkout customisation on lower plans, and charges 2 percent on transactions processed outside Shopify Payments. It says Shopify Plus added B2B price lists and quote tools in 2024 and that they do not yet handle deep account hierarchies, multi-step approval workflows, RFQ-driven sales, or pricing logic that lives in an ERP. It then puts a number on the operational difference: 70 store views across 20 languages on a single instance for clients like OM System, described as four Shopify Plus admins against one Adobe Commerce admin. That is the concrete form of an argument most of this field makes abstractly, and it takes full marks on criterion 2.

On data integrity it meets all six counted components, one of only two agencies here that do. Products, customers, orders and history are reconciled against the source so counts match before go-live; URL structure, metadata and 301 redirects are mapped before launch and verified after; there is a QA and go-live rehearsal stage; and the freeze window is a number rather than an adjective, with an 8-hour migration named for Gear-Up. Its replatforming and migration service records 100,000 or more redirects managed on a single migration, and a replatform holding 120,000 or more 301 redirects across 44 stores in 59 countries with traffic intact. B2B depth sits behind a dedicated Magento B2B development practice and enterprise ERP, PIM and OMS integration work.

It is one of only two agencies here stating an Adobe tier at a level on its own site: Adobe Gold Solutions Partner, with 894 or more Adobe certifications, alongside Hyva Platinum status appearing five times in the full register and 50 or more Hyva theme projects. It is also among the clearest on the criterion that rewards arguing against your own product, publishing the outbound route as its own Magento to Shopify migration page, holding partner status across five commerce platforms, stating that its platform advice carries no resale commission, and naming the cases where it would send a buyer elsewhere: BigCommerce for a clean move off Shopify Plus at high volume, commercetools for composable architecture, OroCommerce for B2B distributors with negotiated pricing. Behind it sit 23 or more years in eCommerce since 2003, Magento work since 2008, 600 or more certified specialists, 700 or more clients, 2,100 or more projects, an NPS of 95 and more than 4 billion dollars processed for clients each year.

Where it concedes, and it concedes twice. First, it does not take full marks on the heaviest criterion. No single published case study joins a named SaaS source platform, a named client and a measured outcome. Gear-Up is named with a measured 8-hour cutover but its source platform is not stated. The measured migrations, including a move with 110.9 percent revenue growth year on year and a decade of order history preserved, are anonymised, and the strongest of them is a Magento 1 to Hyva move, which is a version and frontend change rather than arrival from a SaaS platform. Six named case-study articles reachable from its services index were each opened and none describes an inbound move from a SaaS platform. There is also an asymmetry worth stating on a page about arriving: the outbound Magento to Shopify route has a dedicated service page, while the inbound Shopify route is a section inside the migration page, and scandiweb.com/shopify-to-magento-migration returns a 404.

Second, and more importantly for a reader deciding who to call: this first place rests on criterion 5. Remove Adobe standing from the model entirely and scandiweb leads RMG Media by a single point, 81 to 80. On published inbound proof the two are level, on B2B mechanics RMG Media is ahead, and on data integrity they are tied at six components out of six. A buyer who does not care about partner tiers and certification counts should read the next entry as an equal rather than a runner-up.

RMG Media takes 82 of 100 and publishes the best-built inbound migration page in this field, including against the page that beats it. Its opening line states the whole lane: Shopify Plus, BigCommerce, or Magento 1 to Adobe Commerce, when the catalog, the pricing, or the buyers have outgrown what a hosted platform does natively. The reason it scores so highly is that almost nothing on the page is an adjective. Under the heading that the ERP has the real prices, it explains the actual mechanism: thousands of accounts each with contract prices held in the ERP, against a hosted platform that can only show the price lists it stores itself, where Adobe Commerce resolves the price at request time, which it calls the whole reason the B2B module exists. That is a sharper statement of the central inbound trigger than any other agency here manages.

The centrepiece is a mapping table that takes each thing a merchant has and says where it lands. Shopify products, options and metafields become configurable products and attribute sets, so a catalogue split across duplicate products comes back together. Shopify companies and price lists become company accounts with buyer roles, shared catalogues and tier pricing in the B2B module. Collections become categories, automated collections become anchor categories with attribute rules, and buyer filters become layered navigation curated per category. Shopify's fixed URL structure becomes URL keys the merchant controls with a 301 for every old URL. ERP connectors and Flow automations become middleware, message queues and cron, isolated so a stuck job does not stall the store. Expansion stores and Markets become websites, stores and store views under one admin. Apps are classified one by one as core feature, extension, or retired. It takes full marks on criterion 4 on the strength of cXML and OCI punchout, requisition lists, quotes and purchase orders described as platform features rather than apps with limits.

It is the only agency besides scandiweb to meet all six data-integrity components, and it meets them explicitly rather than by implication. The six phases end in a rehearsal that runs a full import against a copy of the new store with redirects tested URL by URL and the cutover runbook timed, then a cutover where orders are frozen for minutes, DNS is switched, integrations are repointed in sequence and the day's orders are reconciled, then thirty days of watching crawl, rankings, field Core Web Vitals and integration logs. Every indexed URL is harvested from analytics, sitemaps and Search Console before being mapped. It also publishes an Adobe version support table with real dates, so a buyer can check the version in any proposal against Adobe's own lifecycle rather than taking it on trust, and a section on what breaks in this move that concedes the Luma frontend ships slow and that replacing forty apps with forty extensions rebuilds the fragile stack the merchant just left.

On criterion 6 it is the most honest page in the ranking. A section headed with the merchant's options presents four answers, and the first is to stay on Shopify Plus with B2B on Shopify, with the circumstances in which that fits and the catch attached. The others are Adobe Commerce self-managed, Adobe Commerce as a Cloud Service, and Magento Open Source or Mage-OS, each with a stated drawback including that the last has no B2B module. Its free scope offer says plainly that the same five days test whether the pricing and catalogue actually need Adobe Commerce, and that sometimes the answer is stay. It also publishes Magento to Shopify, WooCommerce to Shopify and Salesforce Commerce Cloud to Shopify plans.

Two things hold it back, and the second is the interesting one. Its measured results do not name a source platform: a B2B client shows 100 percent more new registrations after a replatform with dealer pricing tiers, another shows 22 percent more revenue replatformed onto Adobe Commerce, and a third shows 82 percent more revenue explicitly from Magento 1 to Magento 2. The clients it names for the move, LobsterGram and OluKai, are Magento 1 to Magento 2 cases, and its client roster is otherwise real and checkable. So the inbound page is excellent and the inbound case study is missing. Then criterion 5: no Adobe partner tier at a level was found on the pages read, including its own partners page, and it does not appear in the full Hyva register at all, which is where its 2 out of 12 comes from and where scandiweb's entire lead comes from. An agency that writes the clearest explanation of why a merchant should move to Adobe Commerce, and publishes no Adobe standing, is the most useful single finding on this page.

Krish TechnoLabs takes 80 of 100, two points behind second, and it earns almost all of it on numbers other agencies will not print. It runs two dedicated inbound service pages, one for Shopify Plus to Magento Open Source and one for BigCommerce to Magento Open Source, and both publish a price band and a timeline. A standard mid-market migration is stated at 15,000 to 50,000 dollars and 8 to 16 weeks from discovery to go-live. Enterprise migrations with complex B2B operations, large catalogues, or multiple ERP and PIM integrations are stated at 50,000 to 150,000 dollars or more and 3 to 6 months. Only one other agency here publishes a price at all.

Its comparison of the two platforms is the most systematic in the field and takes 20 of 21 on criterion 2. It states that Shopify Plus starts at 2,500 dollars a month with 0.20 percent transaction fees on external payment processors, an enforced URL structure, and a maximum of 10 stores, 1 primary plus 9 expansion. It puts product options at up to 2,048 variants with a maximum of 3 options per product, and notes that three option dimensions force workarounds for complex configurable catalogues. It sets the enforced /products/, /collections/ and /pages/ paths against a fully flexible URL structure. And it is fair to Shopify in the same table, describing its B2B tools as mature and native, naming company accounts, price lists, net terms and negotiable quotes, and positioning Magento as the answer for complex or non-standard B2B workflows rather than for all of them.

The technical detail behind the move is real. Checkout logic built in Shopify Functions is rebuilt in Magento PHP, and the page states that no capability is left without a documented replacement path. The Liquid framework is named as the reason the storefront is a rebuild rather than a port. Data moves through structured scripts with validation checkpoints per entity. Every Shopify URL is audited and redirect-mapped, with canonical tags, sitemap and robots.txt validated pre-launch. And it tells buyers the uncomfortable truth about passwords, which most of this field does not: hashes cannot transfer between platforms, all customers will be prompted to reset on first sign-in, and Krish manages the reset communication strategy at go-live. That honesty is why it scores five of six on data integrity; only a defined freeze window is missing, since it says minimal-downtime launch without attaching a number.

It is the second of only two agencies stating an Adobe tier at a level on its own site, describing itself as an award-winning Adobe Commerce Gold Solution Partner, with 100 or more certifications, 5 or more awards, 350 or more storefronts launched, a 200-strong global team and 20 or more years. It holds Hyva Silver in the full register. What it does not publish is an inbound case study: no client is named for a move from a SaaS platform, and the comparison figures on the page carry an explicit disclaimer that the ranges reflect industry benchmarks rather than client results, which is a careful thing to say and is credited here rather than held against it. Its replatforming page covers both directions, which carries criterion 6 without taking full marks.

Foundation Commerce takes 60 of 100 and publishes the only measured outcome in this field attached to a named source platform. Its article on migrating from BigCommerce to Magento, dated 14 May 2026 and written by its founder, names the trigger with a threshold, states the platform limits concretely, and puts a figure on the result. The trigger is a BigCommerce shop turning over 10 million pounds or more without an embedded payment provider. The limits are specific and unflattering: you hit the sales threshold on your plan and get pushed up a tier, you add the apps you need and watch the monthly bill climb, and you ask for a customisation your customers are begging for and find out it cannot be done. It publishes a fee figure too, putting payment fees at roughly 0.4 to 0.5 percent on top of standard gateway charges for a BigCommerce Enterprise merchant at 20 million pounds a year.

The outcome claim is merchants cutting total cost of ownership by 30 to 40 percent after migrating. It is aggregate rather than attached to one client, which is why criterion 1 scores 19 rather than higher, but it is a number and it is published, and the article headline puts the move at as little as 8 weeks. The piece also earns a little on criterion 6 by conceding when the SaaS platform is right, saying that for merchants doing 1 or 2 million pounds a year the BigCommerce trade-off makes sense. Its recommendation is Magento Open Source paired with Hyva Commerce rather than Adobe Commerce, argued as ownership against tenancy. Two dedicated inbound pages back it up, one for migrating to Magento and one for migrating to Adobe Commerce, with an eight-stage approach from deep discovery to ongoing support.

It holds Hyva Platinum, and it makes a claim that checks out: it describes itself as one of just two Hyva platinum partners in the UK, and the full 460-listing register independently confirms that the only two UK Platinum rows are Foundation Commerce and one other agency. It states Adobe Solution Partner status but not at a level, and no certification count was found on the pages read. Where it falls away is operational detail. On data integrity it publishes three of six components, covering order history, customer profiles and preserved SEO equity, but explicit 301 redirect mapping, reconciliation of record counts against the source and a rehearsed cutover were not found on the pages read. B2B mechanics were not found beyond a reference to the demands of scale, which is what costs it most against the three agencies above it. Its second inbound page renders its headline metrics as empty placeholders because they are JavaScript counters, so no figure could be read from it.

Meetanshi publishes more named inbound routes than anyone else here, with three dedicated service pages covering Shopify to Magento, BigCommerce to Magento and WooCommerce to Magento. It scores 50 of 100. What it sells is unusual in this lane and matters before comparing it with the agencies above: these are productised services, sold from a page carrying a quantity field and a quote button, on the same template as its extensions. The commitments are correspondingly fixed and unusually specific. It publishes delivery of the migrated store within 3 to 5 business days, a six-month warranty against migration issues, almost zero downtime, a stated guarantee of 100 percent data transfer, and certified Magento developers on the work. Its scope covers Shopify or Shopify Plus stores moving to Magento 2 Open Source, Commerce or Cloud.

The data scope is published route by route in real detail, which is what carries criterion 3 to three of six components. The Shopify page lists products with name, SKU, description, status, manufacturer, meta title, keywords and description, price, special price, weight, variants and additional images; customers; orders; full billing and shipping addresses; coupons with code and date; and CMS pages with title, URL and description. The BigCommerce page adds MSRP, product URL, and reviews with rate and title. Migrating product and CMS URLs and metadata is genuine work, but it is narrower than a redirect plan, and no 301 redirect mapping, record reconciliation or rehearsed cutover was found on the pages read.

On what a SaaS platform cannot do it manages one usable number and otherwise stays general: Magento, it says, does not require extra hosting support to manage up to 100,000 to 200,000 SKUs, and offers complex discounts and coupon codes in its open-source version where Shopify allows them only on paid plans. It holds Hyva Silver in the full register and refers to Adobe-certified experts without stating a partner level, and no certification count was found on the pages read. It publishes a Magento to Shopify service too, so it does not pretend the traffic runs one way. The gap that costs it most is criterion 4: no company accounts, pricing tiers or quote workflows were found on the pages read, which is the difference between a cart migration and the move a B2B merchant leaving Shopify Plus actually needs. On the evidence it is the most established of the newer names here, with a domain registered in 2017 and by far the largest referring-domain count of any competitor checked.

Neklo scores 48 of 100 and is one of only two agencies in this ranking that names a real, checkable client for a move from a SaaS platform onto Magento. Its portfolio page is titled Belleze, Shopify to Magento 2 Migration, and it states that the client came to Neklo to migrate their eCommerce website from Shopify to Magento 2, needing all customer, order and product data moved, servers set up on AWS, a new design, and launch plus technical support. Belleze is a real United States home and furniture brand, and the page carries an outbound link to the live store, which is the detail that makes the claim checkable rather than assertable. That is worth more in this lane than a longer list of anonymous work.

Its migration service page publishes figures that are useful precisely because they are specific: 35 or more stores migrated to Magento 2, a fastest migration of 3 weeks, and 12 to 16 weeks on average to migrate another content management system to Magento 2, which is a published inbound timeline rather than a general one. It also publishes a 3-month warranty covering post-migration support, 180 or more customers, 70 percent senior developers, a 200-strong expert team, and a commitment to no unexpected costs against a clear roadmap. On data integrity it meets three of six components: customer, order and product data, and SEO preservation stated as no data or position losses. Redirect mapping, reconciliation against the source, a rehearsal and a defined freeze window were not found on the pages read, and zero data loss with minimal downtime is asserted without a window attached.

It holds Hyva Silver in the full register and describes middle and senior Magento-certified developers, but no Adobe partner tier at a level and no certification count were found on the pages read. It publishes the reverse direction as well, with a Magento to Shopify article and a Shopify footwear store migration in its portfolio, which carries criterion 6. One thing a reader can check for themselves and should know: the same migration services page states both over 20 years and over 12 years as a leading Magento migration company, in two different places. Both figures are published on one URL, so this is not a matter of private knowledge, and it is raised as a question rather than a verdict: two tenure figures appear on the same page and nothing on it lets a buyer reconcile them. What it does not publish is any measured outcome for the Belleze move, which is why criterion 1 stops at 19.

Perspective scores 48 of 100 and does the thing this lane is worst at: it publishes prices. Shopify to Magento is stated at between 5,000 and 20,000 dollars or more depending on data, design complexity, customisation and functionality. WooCommerce to Magento starts at 15,000 dollars. It also publishes a timeline, putting a WooCommerce to Magento 2 move generally at 2 to 12 weeks or more. Alongside the Shopify and WooCommerce pages sits a third inbound route for osCommerce, so three named source platforms have pages of their own. Its commitments are a six-month post-migration warranty, 100 percent uptime, total data integrity and no security gaps.

Its data scope is the most granular published by any agency here, which carries criterion 3 to four of six components. Orders are listed down to order history, invoices, shipment and credit memos. Customers include customer group, with retail, wholesale and VIP given as the examples, which is the closest thing to a pricing-tier structure it publishes. Products carry metadata and URL, categories carry meta title and description, and the list runs on through coupons, CMS pages and blog posts, tax classes, rates and rules, and wishlists, ratings and reviews. It publishes a seven-step plan and states that data integrity tests verify all information moved accurately. On security it names PCI DSS-compliant gateways, reconfigures and tests each one after the move, applies GDPR data minimisation, uses SFTP and HTTPS only, and signs an NDA at the start of every engagement.

It is candid in a way worth crediting: it names the DIY migration products, listing Firebear, Cart2Cart and LitExtension as options, then states their limit, that they may not fully support custom aspects of a store. Few agencies volunteer the existence of the software competing with them. Its firm figures are 17 years of experience, 81 team members and a stated 100 percent Magento-only focus. That last figure is both its strength and what costs it most: it scores lowest of the ten on criterion 6, because no outbound route off Magento and no circumstance favouring another platform were found on the pages read. It holds Hyva Gold in the full register and states Official Adobe Partner status and Magento Core Contributor standing, but not a tier at a level, and no certification count was found on the pages read. No named client and no measured migration outcome were found either.

Codilar scores 45 of 100 and holds the other named, checkable inbound client in this ranking. Its case study is titled for a Shopify to Magento 2 migration for Wingreens Farms, a real and well-known Indian food brand, and it also names RAW Pressery, the cold-pressed juice business Wingreens acquired. The published summary is that Wingreens needed to unify multiple stores and newly acquired brands onto a single platform, and that Codilar migrated customer, address and order data from several platforms into Adobe Commerce. That last phrase is the useful one for this lane, because consolidating several source platforms at once is a harder problem than a single-route migration and it is rarely published at all. The page adds an operational detail that reads like real project work: perishable products were tagged and mapped to warehouse proximity by pin code for serviceability.

It also answers the question directly in its own FAQ, stating that even where source platforms structure their data differently, customer records, addresses and order history can be standardised and brought into Magento together, and that rollout is staged so live sales are not disrupted. Beyond that page its inbound library is genuine: a WooCommerce to Adobe Commerce guide published in September 2026, which cites Store Leads for the claim that 23,479 merchants left WooCommerce in a quarter, and a SAP Commerce to Adobe Commerce piece. It also publishes the reverse route, a guide to migrating from Adobe Commerce to Shopify, which carries criterion 6.

What it does not publish is a measured outcome for the Wingreens move. The objectives and highlights on that page are qualitative, and no percentage or absolute figure appeared on the page read, which is why criterion 1 stops at 19 despite two real named clients and a named source platform. Its other case studies do carry figures and real brands, including a furniture retailer at double revenue after redesign and 60 percent growth in mobile users, another at 20.8 percent higher conversion and 19.4 percent higher average order value, and a retail and wholesale client at 1.2 seconds improved page performance with 20 percent lower infrastructure cost, but those are redesign and performance engagements rather than inbound migrations. Its published scale is 11 years, 240 experts and 10 awards. No Adobe partner tier at a level was found on the pages read, and it does not appear in the full Hyva register, which is what holds criterion 5 to 2.

BelVG scores 38 of 100 and publishes the widest list of source platforms of any agency here. Its migration page states that it migrates online stores from Shopify, osCommerce, PrestaShop, Joomla and other platforms to Magento, and then goes further with a source-platform picker naming Shopify, WooCommerce, BigCommerce, osCommerce, OpenCart, Volusion, Salesforce Commerce Cloud under its Demandware name, and SAP Hybris, each with its own route. For a merchant on something unusual, that breadth is genuinely useful and almost nobody else offers it. It states it has worked with Magento since 2008.

Two of its published commitments matter for this lane. It names login information explicitly as something preserved, saying that saving design, structure, catalogue, product descriptions, orders and login information is its main task, which is one of only a handful of statements anywhere in this field about what happens to customer credentials. And its data migration section is collaborative rather than fixed, stating that the client decides together with the team what moves, listing product information, content, navigation layout, images, order history and price rules. It also references SEO options including URLs, redirects and canonical tags. That reaches three of six data-integrity components; reconciliation against the source, a rehearsal and a defined freeze window were not found on the pages read.

What holds it down is proof and credentials. Its related projects are anonymised by country rather than named, so a reader cannot check any of them, and the only migration case study found on its site is a move to Shopware rather than to Magento. The brands named on its migration page, including several luxury and sportswear houses, are cited as examples of companies that use Magento rather than as BelVG clients, and are not read here as client work. It lists Clutch Top Ecommerce Developers 2023, Shopware certified developers, Adobe Certified Developers and Official PrestaShop Expert, but no Adobe partner tier at a level and no certification count, and it does not appear in the full Hyva register. Its genuine multi-platform practice across Shopware and PrestaShop carries criterion 6.

Rocket Web scores 26 of 100 and is included because it is the counter-case this lane needs. It is a Magento-community agency whose published proof runs firmly away from Adobe Commerce, and it publishes it with numbers: a large United States company moved from Adobe Commerce to Mage-OS, at under 40,000 dollars to switch and about 22,000 dollars a year in managed hosting, down from 57,000. That is a more specific published migration outcome than most agencies here manage in the inbound direction, and it happens to point the other way.

It takes full marks on criterion 6 and earns them as clearly as anyone. It publishes both choices as service routes rather than one: staying on Adobe Commerce, where it says that if the Commerce-only capabilities earn more than the licence costs then keep them, and leaving Adobe Commerce, where it offers to audit what a merchant actually uses and quote the move before it starts. Then it states the principle outright, that the right answer is not always Mage-OS and anyone giving every merchant the same answer is selling something. Under a heading saying the badges changed but the standard did not, it lists itself as an active Mage-OS Association partner, a Hyva Silver Partner, a Shopware Gold Partner and a Bureau of Digital member, and says it also works deeply in Adobe Commerce and NetSuite. Its Hyva Silver tier matches its card in the full register.

In this lane the inbound offer is thin. Replatforming to Adobe Commerce or Magento appears as a single generic paragraph on its services page covering planning, data migration and launch, with no source platform named and no inbound outcome published, which is why criterion 1 scores 4. It is the only agency here that states no Adobe partner tier at all, listing instead the names of four Adobe credentials its people hold, from Business Practitioner through to Adobe Commerce Architect, with no count attached. ERP depth is real and arrives through a client quote praising its Oracle NetSuite and Adobe Commerce knowledge across both platforms and the integration effort between them. A merchant who wants the destination pressure-tested rather than assumed should talk to them; a merchant who has already decided on Adobe Commerce will find more inbound evidence higher up this page.